(Supplement
to section 2.2.3.2)
Principles and parameters
It has been hypothesized that
Universal Grammar consists of principles, which all languages follow,
and parameters, which represent a restricted range of structural
possibilities. Here is a flavour of the kind of knowledge that linguists
have hypothesized makes up our Universal Grammar:
The principle of structure
dependency
All languages are built
around the unit of 'phrases' or 'constituents', not single words.
eg To form a question
from a statement, you need to know about moving 'phrases' not words:
Jo is in the garden
-> Is Jo in the garden? ü
Possible rule
= switch first and second words around BUT ...
The cat is in the
garden -> Cat the is in the garden X
SO possible rule = move the verb to the beginning of the sentence
Is the cat in the
garden ü
The cat who is in the garden at the moment is next door's
Is the cat who in the garden at the moment is next door's?
X
Sensible Rule = move
the main verb in front of the subject noun phrase
[Is] - [the cat who is in the garden at the moment] - next
door's?
|
The principle of phrase
construction
The basic components
of these 'phrases' are a key element (known as the HEAD), plus associated
elements known as SPECIFIERS and COMPLEMENTS which all behave in
predictable ways, whatever the nature of the head.
Noun
head : |
[The]
CAT [in the garden] |
Verb
head |
[often]
CATCHES [birds] |
Adjective
head |
The
cat is [very] CONTENT [to bask in the sun] |
Preposition
head |
to bask
[ ] IN [the sun] |
As you can see, various
words can make up the Specifier and the Complement units, and phrases
can be contained within phrases, but each phrase unit has the same
basic construction.
The Head parameter
Languages appear to have
two basic alternatives with regard to the position of the HEAD element
and its COMPLEMENT. The HEAD can either come before the COMPLEMENT
as is the case in English or French
Verb phrase ....
|
TUE la souris
|
(KILLS the mouse) |
Prepositional phrase... |
DANS le jardin
|
(IN the garden) |
or it can come after,
as in Japanese or Chinese
Verb phrase |
Nihonjin DESU |
(Japanese AM) |
Prepositional phrase |
Nihon NI |
(Japan IN) |
|
To explain how Universal Grammar
can be claimed to facilitate the first language acquisition process, let
us take the example of the Head Parameter. Instead of having to work out
how every single word functions in relation to every single other word,
children need only be alert to two possibilities - head first or head
last. They can assume that this construction principle will apply generally
throughout the grammar. This makes any variations much easier to deal
with, because somehow the child knows they are exceptions. These
exceptions to Universal Grammar will then have to be learned through implicit
induction from the input and memorization.
This appears to be what happens
for L1 French children learning to put a complement (object pronouns)
before a head (the verb). As a general rule, complements follow heads
in French as in English
but |
Le chat TUE
[la souris] |
(The cat KILLS [the mouse])
|
Le chat [la] TUE |
(The cat [it] KILLS) |
The assumption is that French
children will very quickly place complements after heads (objects after
verbs), according to their Head Parameter setting. Object pronouns are
an exception to this, so this structural feature has to be induced from
the input - and sure enough, French children have problems acquiring the
correct positioning of object pronouns just as English learners of French
do (see Reflective task 9, and for
more discussion Towell and Hawkins, 1994: 68-70)
|