This tutor teaches on
an institution-wide language programme (IWLP) Her approach also involves
doing a word count but she only marks the first (or last) X number
of words (eg 300). She underlines all the errors, allocating a mark
to them according to how much they interrupt the fluency of the writing.
If the focus of the task is grammar, she might weight them according
to the significance of the formal error. For example, ½ for a minor
error such as spelling or orthography that does not detract from the
flow of the text; 1 for an error such as a case ending, adjective
agreement or minor word order problem, that affects readability but
not in a major way; and 1½ for an error that interrupts the flow of
the text, makes the message unclear or ambiguous and thus confuses
the reader, such as inappropriate tense, misleading pronominal reference,
wrong choice of vocabulary or poor use of logical connector. The tutor
adds the various scores (say, 40) and calculates an error quotient
using a slightly different approach to that of the tutor in Model
1: she divides the error total by the number of words marked, thus
removing the need for a calculation of standardized length, ie 40/300
= 0.13. This tutor does also mark other material beyond the 300 but
excludes it from her calculations to ensure a degree of comparability. |
|